Considering Cube or looking for alternatives? Learn more about your options below.
Looking for Cube alternatives? We’re here to help.
Few companies grow without careful financial planning and cash flow management. Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) teams assist companies with budgeting, forecasting, and analysis that support the CFO, CEO, and Board’s corporate decision-making.
Financial planners rely on FP&A tools to analyze every department and present stakeholders with an overview of the organization’s risks and opportunities. Spreadsheets are the most common tool used, but rely on manual data entry and copy-pasting, which lead to time-consuming and costly errors. A lot of common financial analysis tasks like variance analyses, rollovers, and visualizations of different time periods and data sets, have to be rebuilt, over and over. Modern tools combine the familiar Excel format with the speed and power of consumer apps to solve these issues and present data in a clear, visual format that stakeholders can access at any time.
One tool used by FP&A professionals is the Cube FP&A platform. Cube promises effective modeling, forecasting, and collaboration through data processing and presentation features. Cube has a number of alternatives that are also worth a look, including OnPlan, Centage, Mosaic, Jirav, and Limelight. Some might be a better fit for your business. This article compares the various options available to help you pick the best solution.
Cube is a solid FP&A management software platform. It provides real-time financial and/or operational data for analysis and planning. While Cube claims it saves time and reduces errors by combining the familiar Excel format with performance software, users report that Cube isn’t intuitive and has a steep learning curve.
Here are some reasons to consider alternatives to Cube:
Cube uses an information aggregation model. When mistakes crop up, users find them difficult to fix. Extra entries have to be overwritten instead of erased.
Many users report that it is difficult to tailor your data and financials to your preferred view. Cube provides implementation consultants to resolve the issue, but it is not a plug-and-play solution and takes effort to adapt.
Financial managers state that they had difficulties using Cube in the early stages. It’s not as intuitive as OnPlan or Mosaic and requires an onboarding specialist to implement, which drives up costs and wastes time.
While it’s a one-off event, the loading process is extremely lengthy and frustrating, leading to downtime. Financial teams have to plan implementation carefully to avoid disruption during the month- or year-end close.
Users report bugs and errors more frequently with Cube than other FP&A solutions. Others say Cube needs additional features and development.
While Cube offers discounts to start-ups, the software is expensive and complex compared to similar solutions like OnPlan. Essential plans start from $850 per month, and the Premium plan is $1,850 per month. The company does not release the cost of its Enterprise-level pricing tier without a formal quote request.
Before digging into some of the alternatives to Cube, let’s recap the disadvantages:
If these disadvantages give you pause, look at some of the alternatives to Cube. Some solutions are more affordable and reliable.
OnPlan is an all-in-one FP&A solution that streamlines financial forecasting, budgeting, and workflow management by connecting existing spreadsheets to a robust analytics hub. OnPlan is one of the most flexible and powerful SaaS solutions on the market. It’s easy to use and straightforward from the start. It is the ideal solution for small and midmarket companies that require powerful analytics capabilities, a flexible API, and user-friendliness to accelerate adoption by end-users.
OnPlan supports integration with several third-party applications and systems, including ERP systems, customer relationship management, and business intelligence systems that include QuickBooks, Salesforce Sage Intacct, NetSuite, Xero, and others. Pricing is available on a simple monthly subscription basis with world-class support.
Like Cube, financial planners can use OnPlan to create strategic plans and analyses, synchronize information across systems into a single, centralized data repository, or perform what-if scenario planning to test new opportunities or risks with a few simple clicks.
While OnPlan and Cube are very similar in functionality, OnPlan is a better value, faster, and easier to use. OnPlan uses Excel formats and an intuitive user interface that shortens the learning curve and gets teams up and running in a matter of days, not months. Companies realize the value of OnPlan much faster than the alternatives.
Centage Planning Maestro is a cloud-native financial intelligence, planning, and analytics platform. The platform provides insight into an organization’s financial health at a glance, which allows them to react quickly to market changes and evaluate new opportunities.
Like OnPlan and Cube, companies make forecasts using several variables with Centage Planning Maestro. Teams make and compare assumptions through what-if scenario analyses and present data using visualization tools.
Planning Maestro includes ad hoc reporting capabilities, access, and version controls, asset lifecycle management tools, cash management capabilities, and KPI tracking. Centage is applicable to multiple departments and companies. Centage also has the edge over Cube as it offers easy-to-use pre-built modules and templates without depending on proprietary scripts or formulas that you must maintain. The company uses wizards to guide clients through the budgeting, planning, and reporting process, which minimizes the need for implementation support.
However, some negative reviews highlight integration failures and customer support issues. This is a considerable failing for a software solution that is a little more cumbersome to manage than its competitors. Data governance is a particular problem spot, as users note that data governance, version control and updates are tough to manage. Planning Maestro isn’t the most user-friendly option on this list either; navigation and reporting are complex and hard to understand for many users.
Mosaic is a strategic finance platform used for agile planning and reporting. The platform consolidates information from existing systems in a single, cloud-based and cross-functional view. Mosaic is useful for gaining holistic insight into an organization via easy-to-understand dashboards.
The software’s automation features save time by reducing manual inputs and providing users with the ability to reconcile and update forecasts. Its ability to integrate with data source systems like the sales pipeline or accounting records powers the financial forecasts compiled by the software. Multiple modeling scenarios are available.
While Mosaic is useful, creating custom reporting metrics, such as KPIs like NPS scores, is not easy. This gives OnPlan an advantage over Mosaic. Mosaic’s dashboards receive high praise, but they are not exportable, complicating reporting. Many users say that the many limitations give the impression of a tool still in development, but new feature releases have been few and far in between.
Jirav is a budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and dashboarding solution. The company offers a user-friendly interface and native integrations to increase data visibility. The company targets smaller businesses with 5-500 employees.
Businesses can use Jirav to create workforce, sales, and business plans through a driver-based modeling engine. Like OnPlan and Centage Planning Maestro, the tool has robust data visualization capabilities and KPI monitoring. Jirav is more affordable than Cube but still pricey for SMBs.
Unlike some other solutions that combine spreadsheets with a modern application interface, Jirav replaces spreadsheets. This will make the learning curve steeper for some. Like Mosaic, the tool is very limited in terms of its reporting capabilities. Dashboards are hard to understand and customize, and formulas may be too simplistic for your needs. While the move away from Excel spreadsheets is perhaps an understandable positioning move (creating something new is often associated with creating something better), in practice it complicates matters for FP&A professionals that are familiar and comfortable with spreadsheets. In this instance, the familiar might be the preferred option as finance professionals end up reverting naturally to Excel and abandoning the tool along the way. Unless you are already familiar with Jirav, it’s going to be harder to learn and adapt to.
Limelight is a modern, web-based financial planning and reporting platform that offers data integration, collaboration, and reporting. Limelight describes their user base as “Finance & FP&A teams who have outgrown their spreadsheets.” Limelight integrates with ERP software for real-time planning and forecasting. Limelight centralizes data and increases collaboration between departments.
While Limelight is a good forecasting and planning tool, most teams use it as a workforce planning tool, which is by far its most advanced and practical module. Limelight gives companies more accurate projection capabilities into the workforce by using employee-specific data linked to actual payroll data (ADP). This allows companies to view both historically paid hours and project-specific hours logged by employees into the future.
It’s useful for companies that use seasonal workers, as it enables employee counts, accurate paid time, and more.
While clients say that customer support is good, implementation is difficult and prone to errors over time. While Limelight is a good workforce planning tool, Cube, OnPlan, and the other tools mentioned in this review have better analytical and planning features. Limelight does not purport to drill down into the finer details and its reporting capabilities can be extremely limited. Users may find that they outgrow Limelight fairly quickly, particularly if they grow or expand the business.
Financial analytics and reporting can help business leaders gain new insights, evaluate opportunities and make confident decisions. Financial planning and analysis tools help companies align with strategy and operations to maximize results and drive accuracy and accountability across departments. FP&A teams can present data in an attractive and easy-to-understand visual format that increases understanding and accelerates the decision-making process.
Many of the alternatives to Cube have similar features but vary dramatically in terms of their flexibility, ease of adoption, and implementation. When making a decision, look for a tool that is easy to set up, implement and maintain over time. Your requirements are unique, and whichever solution you choose should be the best possible option for your business needs.
Learn how OnPlan gives your model superpowers.
Book a demo